Home > Essay > The Clergy Driven Church – Part 1

The Clergy Driven Church – Part 1

First off, on a personal note, with the start of university I have become very busy and may struggle to produce these postings on a regular basis. I am also heavily involved in missionary work on campus which is facing both persecution and success. I would appreciate prayer for our work.

The modern church, which we shall call the “clergy driven” church looks alot like this:

The Clergy Driven Church

In a clergy driven church the clergy are responsible for all the “services” that church supplies. That is, the clergy run the worship, give the sermons, do the praying, the counselling, the evangelising, and generally make all the decisions. The laypeople receive all the churches services via interaction with the clergy and have little need for each other provided that they support the clergy (that is the church will continue to run even if its members fail to relate with each other – as demonstrated by many churches today). The church service is the result of years of testing how to best project the clergy’s services over a large number of people. This makes sense, as a large number of people are required to support the clergy.

If you want evidence of this consider your typical Sunday Service. The large congregation sit all facing the front of the church whilst a considerably smaller group of people administer the service from the front. During worship the greater congregation follows the lead of the smaller worship group. The congregation have no say in what is sung, or how it is sung. During announcements or communion the greater congregation again listens to a smaller group, usually one. And during the centrepiece of the Sunday service, the sermon, a single person is disseminating the teaching “service” to the rest of the congregation. It is quite possible to attend church without talking to a single person. Interaction between members of the congregation is usually limited to a pitiful ten minute timeslot or before or after the service when officially the meeting is yet to start or has ended.

In order to counteract this many churches have bible talks or small groups. Whilst this is a step in the right direction, they are usually an add-on and are not truly central to the church’s operations.

Whilst the clergy driven church has been seeing lives saved for thousands of years, it falls short of the churches potential and detracts from some of the central tenets of our beliefs. Over the next few posts we shall examine 12 problems with clergy driven churches (I wrote these a while ago which make my work load easier as well).

The priesthood of all believers

In the Old Testament, the Jews could not directly relate with God. Instead they worshiped via a middle man who was the priesthood. The New Testament not only restored the ability for all men to have a personal relationship with God, it also restored the ability for all men to act on his behalf. Unfortunately the Catholic Church saw the loss of this significant change. The reformation would latter restore our direct relationship with God, but it failed to restore our place as workers of him. As such we have direct communication with God, but the clergy still does all the work!

The New Testament church is not about a large group of people supporting some small group of gifted men of God. This is Old Testament thinking. In the New Testament we are all gifted men of God! The New Testament is about empowering every believer in the body of Christ. It is about every believer playing and equal part, every believer having equal importance. Unfortunately this is not the case today. When the pastor of a church is given the bulk of the meeting’s time and a lowly member none, this is inequality – unfair to both the pastor and the congregation.

It is true that there are leaders, there are preachers, there are teachers, there are apostles, and there are pastors. But these positions should be of no more importance as helpers, or givers, or encouragers, or of prayers. (Why is it that a preacher can receive a standing ovation yet an elderly woman who has provided meals to the single mother next door receives none?) What’s more, these gifts are distributed among all God’s people. Not just the clergy! Why is it then that in the Sunday Service, the centre of the modern church, that the clergy are the only ones exercising their gifts for the benefit of the others?

This issue will become clearer as it reveals itself as the root of many other problems.

Waste of potential

The inability of the congregation to use their gifts results in a huge loss of potential for the church! Not only this, but each person has experiences and knowledge that can help people or provide a different perspective on any topic. However, it is very rare, and always rude, for any member of the congregation to offer their comments during a sermon. They cannot share their experiences, or their knowledge. This is God’s knowledge that he has given them! But they are required to remain silent unless they are given permission (ordained) by the church to express what God has given them.

Why do we do this? Why are we gagging God? What if God wanted to use the lowliest member of the church, the one with poor clothes that always stank? Could he stand up and speak, and how would he be received? What if God intended to change people’s lives with his words?

It is not enough to expect people to give “words of knowledge” during an allocated time in the church meeting. Imagine if I were to stand up and give this as a speech! Not only that, but many of God’s people are introverted, they can’t stand up before a hundred, but they do have things which are important to say. We must accommodate these people!

I cannot imagine how many people could have been saved, or how many lives could have been changed, if only God had been allowed to use any believer he saw fit for the task at hand.

  1. April 6, 2007 at 12:25 am | #1

    Good post. I found your blog through Andrea’s blog and I like what I see so far. Keep it up! I wish there could be a “new” reformation that would go back to the book of Acts church, and be the church that God made us to be so that the world could be saved!

    Blessings,
    Jen

  2. April 20, 2007 at 4:46 am | #2

    I think that is one subject that I’ve preached more about in the last ten years than any other. The song goes “If we are the body, why aren’t His arms moving, …” All of us have a part to do to keep the church (that’s the people not the building) moving in the direction God wants us to move. When Jesus said to go forth and teach all nations He was not just speaking to the apostles, but to everyone who has ever read or heard those words. In our church (Prsebyterian) by the rules the only thing I am responsible for is the sermon and the hymns. The Session (the ruling elders) are responsible for the rest of it, but I do end up in the middle much of the time. Since one of the requirements to be a Presbyterian is a poor singing voice (;o) we don’t have a small group leading the singing so that’s not a problem. I try and get someone from the congregation involved in part of the service every Sunday, usually with the Minute for Missions. But, more importantly, the entire congregation is involved in reaching out and inviting in visitors, showing them the love of God, and accepting everyone with open arms. We have a supper/fellowship time on Wednesday before Bible Study, and trying to get everyone to be quiet so we can start the service (or get them off the front porch afterward) does lead to a lot of interaction. But to end this, I have to admit that the picture you paint is too often the norm.

  3. Sherri Kish
    June 26, 2007 at 1:25 pm | #3

    I was so happy to find someone agreeing with the cry of my heart. I can no longer attend such meetings and am desperate to find a community of believers in Mpls. Mn where all can come to share what God is teaching them. I especially feel that the present system is detremental to God’s command to fathers to teach their own children…Deut.6:7-”You shall teach them diligently to your children…The acceptable norm is to bring your children to church to hear the Word of God. I think that every man sitting in a pew should be held accountable for being the priest of his own home. What a travesty that a man should be allowed to miss such an honored calling in passing the baton to his own inheritance. Most men see themselves as ill-equipped and don’t have a clue. I believe that a pastor’s role could be used to inspire the men of his congregation to rise to their scriptural calling.

  1. May 10, 2007 at 8:31 am | #1